Skip to content
The Product Guys
All principles
MemoryAlso called Primacy and recency

Serial position effect

Items at the start and end of a list are recalled better than items in the middle.


Ask someone to recall a list and their accuracy plots as a U. The first few items benefit from primacy, because they got more rehearsal into long-term memory. The last few benefit from recency, because they are still active in short-term memory, and that half of the curve disappears if you insert a delay before recall.

The serial position curve

100%75%50%25%0%123456789Position in the listProportion recalled
Recall is highest for the first items and the last items, and lowest for items around the middle of the list. The recency half of the curve collapses if recall is delayed, which is why the end position helps a spoken price more than a list still visible on screen. Shape is illustrative of Murdock, 1962.

How it shows up in software

Navigation bars, pricing tiers, onboarding steps and option lists all have a first and a last slot that get remembered. Interface lists differ from laboratory lists in one large way: the user can see them, so recall matters less than scanning and clicking. The effect earns its keep for anything people must carry away from the screen, such as a spoken price, a set of instructions or a plan comparison.

Using it well

  • Put the item you most want carried away first, and the action you most want taken last.
  • Bury nothing important in the middle of a list longer than five items. Split it, group it, or promote the buried item.
  • In a list of steps a person will follow away from the screen, restate the critical step at the end rather than trusting the middle to survive.
  • When testing recall of an option set, rotate order between participants. Otherwise you measure position, not preference.

Where it turns manipulative

  • Ordering pricing tiers so the highest margin plan sits in the recency slot while the plan most people need is hidden mid-list.
  • Using the last position for a pre-ticked upsell so it is the final thing seen and the easiest thing to click past.
  • Treating the curve as a reason to keep menus artificially short. On a visible list, scanning cost matters more than recall, and cutting real options to chase a memory effect removes function.

Where you have seen it

  • macOS Dock

    Finder is pinned first and Trash sits last, so the two positions people remember hold the two items always needed.

  • Google Search

    Results pages have long shown that first and last positions on the page draw disproportionate clicks, which is why paid slots occupy both ends.

  • Airbnb

    The booking summary repeats the total price at the bottom of the panel, directly above the reserve button, so the number sits in the final position.

What the research says

  • Ebbinghaus, 1885Well evidenced

    Self-experiments on nonsense syllable lists showed position within the list changed how many repetitions relearning required.

    A single participant, who was also the experimenter.

  • Murdock, 1962Well evidenced

    Free recall of word lists produced the U-shaped serial position curve across varied list lengths and presentation rates.

  • Glanzer and Cunitz, 1966Well evidenced

    A filled delay of 30 seconds between presentation and recall removed the recency advantage while leaving primacy intact, separating the two mechanisms.

Grades are a judgement about the evidence, not about how useful the idea is. Plenty of contested effects are still worth knowing, as long as you do not cite them as settled.

Related